Back

Native American Maternal Genealogies

Simon Southerton

In 1990, Theodore Schurr at Emory University, Georgia, discovered that Native Americans had four different maternal DNA lineages. These lineages are now known by the names A, B, C and D. He found that these lineages also occurred in selected Asian populations. The maternal DNA lineages of Native Americans can be distinguished by detecting rare changes in the order of the 16,569 odd DNA letters that make up the mitochondrial genome.
In the last decade the mitochondrial DNA lineages of over 5,500 Native Americans from about 150 tribes have been determined. These tribes are scattered over North, Central and South America. Several thousand natives of Peru have been DNA tested and these unpublished results are held at BYU (personal communication with Scott Woodward). This research has confirmed that the A, B, C and D maternal lineages are the major female lineages; found in about 96% of Native Americans. About 4% of Native American maternal lineages do not belong to any of the four major lineages. Originally, these were all assumed to have been lineages introduced after the arrival of Columbus, however, many have been found to belong to another group, and are known as the X lineage. The X lineage occurs at its highest frequency (about 25%) in several tribes in northeastern North America. Approximately 2.5% of Native Americans have mtDNA belonging to the X lineage family.
The four major DNA lineages of Native Americans occur at significant levels in Asian populations, but are not found in Europe or African populations. The X lineage occurs only at low levels in Central Asia but it is found in western Eurasian populations at a frequency of about 5%. It is common in the Middle East where its frequency reaches >20%, raising the possibility that it was brought to the Americas by a population migrating from the Middle East. Naturally this lineage is particularly interesting to people familiar with the Book of Mormon story. Further work on the X lineage family revealed that Native American X lineages are most closely related to X lineages found in the Altaian people of Central Asia (Southern Siberia), near Lake Baikal. The Siberian Altai X lineages occupy a position intermediate between the European and American lineages. None of the Native American lineages directly descends from European X lineages.
About one in every 200 Native Americans has a maternal DNA lineage that is not found in Asian populations. Instead these lineages are common in Europe or Africa. The DNA scientists doing the research believe that these lineages were brought into native populations after Columbus, given the massive immigration from Europe and Africa during the last 500 years. Several lines of evidence support this view.

  • These lineages are more common in tribes that interacted more heavily with European and African groups since Columbus.
  • They are generally not found in tribes that have had little contact with Europeans.
  • If scientists interview Native Americans to ascertain pure ancestry, they do not detect these lineages.

None of these lineages have been detected in DNA isolated from ancient remains.

Summary Table

Maternal Lineage (Number of individuals)

Region A B C D other total
Alaska 237 4 13 251 24 529
Greenland 82 0 0 0 0 82
Canada 443 42 82 29 58 654
United States 461 430 253 107 78 1329
Central America 290 117 68 17 4 496
South America 332 820 582 583 60 2377
TOTAL
1845 1413 998 987 224 5467
Percentage
34 26 18 18 4

Data in this table was collected by S. Southerton from approximately 46 scientific research papers published during the last decade up to November 2002. To my knowledge, this is the most comprehensive summary of the maternal DNA lineages of Native Americans. About 99.5% of Native American maternal DNAs originated in Asia and are not related to Israelite maternal lineages. In a recent talk (FAIRS, 2001) Scott Woodward from BYU admitted that about 90% of Native Americans have an Asian origin. In my view this is a misrepresentation of the current data.

Polynesian Genealogies

As with Native Americans, the molecular genealogies of Polynesians descend westward into Asia. About 95% of Polynesians have a B type maternal DNA lineage. The Polynesian B lineage is related to the B lineages found among Native Americans and Asians. A direct Asian origin of Polynesian B lineages is most strongly supported by the occurrence of two additional changes in the DNA sequence of Polynesian B mtDNAs. These changes are found in some South East Asian B lineages but not among Native Americans. There is a steady increase in the frequency of the Poly B maternal lineage as one moves from Asia to the extremities of Polynesia. In some places like New Zealand, Easter Island and Samoa, almost 100% of native individuals have a Polynesian B lineage.
About 5% of Polynesian female lineages do not belong to the B lineage family. Most of these Polynesian lineages have been found among people from Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea and about 1% originated in European populations. These observations suggest, just as Pacific archaeologists have suspected, that the Polynesians island hopped as they sailed out into the Pacific, interbreeding with Melanesian and other South East Asian peoples on route.
Polynesian Y chromosomes are also of Asian origin. About 80% of the men sailing out into Polynesia had Y chromosomes that originated in Melanesia. The other 20% had Y lineages that are common in Southeast Asia including the Philippines, Java and Taiwan.
Currently there is scant genetic evidence for migration of people from the Americas to Polynesia. The Native American 1G male lineage, which is found in about 60% of New World males, has not been observed in the Pacific among Polynesians or Melanesians.




References

References in blue are the most significant ones. Please note that most of these are scientific papers. The paper by Schurr (2000) gives a good summary and is easy to follow. The journals can be found in most medical libraries attached to a university.

Native American Research Papers

Bonatto S.L. and Salzano F.M. (1997) Diversity and age of the four major haplogroups, and their implications for the peopling of the New World. American Journal of Human Genetics 61, 1413-1423.

Brown M.D. et al. (1998). mtDNA Haplogroup X: an ancient link between Europe/Western Asia and North America? American Journal of Human Genetics 63, 1852-1861.

Derenko et al. (2001) The presence of mitochondrial haplogroup X in Altaians from south Siberia (letter). American Journal of Human Genetics 69, 237-241.

Forster et al. (1996) Origin and evolution of Native American mtDNA variation: a reappraisal. American Journal of Human Genetics 59, 935-945.

Karafet T. et al. (1997) Y chromosome markers and Trans-Bering Strait dispersals. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 102, 301-314.

Karafet T. et al. (1999) Ancestral Asian source(s) of New World Y-chromosome founder lineages. American Journal of Human Genetics 64, 817-831.

Lell J.T. et al. (1997) Y chromosome polymorphisms in Native American and Siberian populations: identification of Native American Y chromosome lineages. Human Genetics 100, 536-543.

Lell J.T. et al. (2002) The dual origin and Siberian affinities of Native American Y chromosomes. American Journal of Human Genetics 70, 192-206.

Lorenz J.G. and Smith D.G. (1996) Distribution of four founding mtDNA haplogroups among native North Americans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 101, 307-323.

Merriwether et al. (1995) American Journal of Physical Anthropology 98, 411-430.

Santos F.R. et al. (1999) The central Siberian origin for Native American Y chromosomes. American Journal of Human Genetics 64, 619-628.

**Schurr T.G. (2000) Mitochondrial DNA and the peopling of the New World. American Scientist 88, 246-253.

Schurr T.G. et al. (1990). Amerindian mitochondrial DNAs have rare Asian mutations at high frequencies, suggesting they derived from four primary maternal lineages. American Journal of Human Genetics 46, 613-623.

Scozzari T. et al. (1997) mtDNA and Y chromosome-specific polymorphisms in modern Ojibwa: implications about the origin of their gene pool. American Journal of Human Genetics 60, 241-244.

Smith D.G. et al. (1999) Distribution of mtDNA haplogroup X among Native North Americans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 110, 271-284.

Starikovskaya Y.B. et al. (1998) mtDNA diversity in Chukchi and Siberian Eskimos: implications for the genetic history of ancient Beringia and the peopling of the New World. American Journal of Human Genetics 63, 1473-1491.

Stone A.C. and Stoneking M. (1998) mtDNA analysis of a prehistoric Oneota population: implications for the peopling of the New World. American Journal of Human Genetics 62, 1153-1170.

Torroni A. et al. (1992) Native American mitochondrial DNA analysis indicates that the Amerind and the Nadene populations were founded by two independent migrations. Genetics 130, 153-162.

Torroni A. et al. (1994a) Mitochondrial DNA "clock" for the Amerinds and its implications for timing their entry into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91, 1158-1162.

Torroni A. et al. (1994c) mtDNA and Y-chromosome polymorphisms in four Native American populations from southern Mexico. American Journal of Human Genetics 54, 303-318.

Polynesian Papers

Gray R.D. and Jordan F.M. (2000) Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature 405, 1052-1055.

Hertzberg M. et al. (1989). An Asian specific 9-bp deletion of mitochondrial DNA is frequently found in Polynesians. American Journal of Human Genetics 44, 504-510.

Hurles M.E. et al. (1998) European Y-chromosomal lineages in Polynesians: A contrast to the population structure revealed by mtDNA. American Journal of Human Genetics 63, 1793-1806.

Kayser M. et al. (2000) Melanesian origin of Polynesian Y chromosomes. Current Biology 10, 1237-1246.

Lum J.K. and Cann R.L. (1998) mtDNA and language support a common origin of Micronesians and Polynesians in Island Southeast Asia. American Journal of Anthropology 105, 109-119.

Lum J.K. and Cann R.L. (2000) mtDNA lineage analysis: origins and migrations of Micronesians and Polynesians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 113, 151-168.

Lum J.K. et al. (1998) Mitochondrial and nuclear genetic relationships among Pacific Island and Asian populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 63, 613-624.

Melton T. et al. (1995) Polynesian genetic affinities with Southeast Asian populations as identified by mtDNA analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 57, 403-414.

Murray-McIntosh R.P. et al. (1998) Testing migration patterns and estimating founding population size in Polynesia by using human mtDNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 95, 9047-9052.

Stoneking M. and Wilson A.C. (1989) Mitochondrial DNA. in The Colonization of the Pacific: A Genetic Trail. Hill A.V.S. and Serjeantson S. (eds) Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 215-245.

Su B. et al. (2000) Polynesian origins: insights from the Y chromosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97, 8225-8228.

Sykes B.C. et al. (1995) The origins of the Polynesians: an interpretation from mitochondrial lineage analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 57, 1463-1475.

 

Back

Last update September 19, 2003